So I picked up a new book from the library today. Lately – and partly because I want to go into pastoral care and chaplaincy – I’ve been intrigued by the concept of suffering in Christian theology. I’ve been reading C.S. Lewis’ The Problem of Pain, which is certainly a good read, but I’m now distracted by Douglas John Hall’s God & Human Suffering. In this blog though, I’m not going to talk about the theology of the Cross or about suffering in general. I am going to comment on a very thought-provoking statement Hall made during the first chapter of his book regarding theological truth. He writes:
Theological truth is not static. It must always be discovered afresh. For while truth is no doubt “one,” as the medieval thinkers insisted, life is forever in flux. Truth, therefore, to preserve precisely its unity, its integrity, must always readjust itself to the changing circumstances of time and place. What is eminently true in one social context may in another constitute precisely a way of avoiding the truth. The search for a true theology is thus a never-ending vocation of the church. The gospel, far from being the steadfast, unchanging, and rather obvious “proclamation” that it is frequently assumed to be, is in fact always in need of restatement; for its principal object is to address, engage, convict, and make new; and this can be attained only through a difficult struggle with the spirit of the age.
What is Hall asserting in this paragraph? Something a lot of people I know would deem “radical” or “liberal.” But is it really that far off track? I say no. Really, Hall is reaffirming my strong belief that our Christian theology must – and does – change with the times, as does the interpretation of the Bible itself.
Our theological truths are not the same as the theological truths held by believers – faithful as we are to the ministry of Christ – two thousand years ago. Like it or not, our interpretation of things such as Christology, Eschatology, the Eucharist, heaven and hell, and baptism have changed – however slightly or greatly – over the course of history. And I firmly believe that the theology of my children’s future will be quite different than the theology owned by my grandparents.
As times changes, and as societies move forward in the progression of human rights and equality for all people, our theology has to change. There is no way the Christian belief can remain static while humanity moves forward. And, contrary to what some might think, this is not a bad thing. Society is not molding Christianity into what it wants it to be, and Christianity is not giving in to the pressures of the world. Instead, both are growing together, intertwined with one another, learning from each other, and teaching each other. As society moves forward, so does theology. As theology moves forward, so does society. By changing our theology we are not moving away from God, either. Rather, we are moving toward God, who sees the world changing and knows that Christianity must change with it.
I do not believe that God is a static God; the Creator moves alongside creation just as a parent watches their child grow into an adult. And just as a child does not remain the same for eternity, neither can humanity. We must grow toward a better future, a more tolerant future, a future that will bond our world together in unity. And as we grow toward this perfect future, our theology must grow toward a perfect end.
Recent Comments